Review



anova followed by fisher’s lsd test  (GraphPad Software Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol GraphPad Software Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    GraphPad Software Inc anova followed by fisher’s lsd test
    Anova Followed By Fisher’s Lsd Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anova followed by fisher’s lsd test/product/GraphPad Software Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anova followed by fisher’s lsd test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    90
    SAS institute fisher's least significant difference (lsd) test
    Fisher's Least Significant Difference (Lsd) Test, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fisher's least significant difference (lsd) test/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fisher's least significant difference (lsd) test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    GraphPad Software Inc anova followed by fisher’s lsd test
    Anova Followed By Fisher’s Lsd Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anova followed by fisher’s lsd test/product/GraphPad Software Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anova followed by fisher’s lsd test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    GraphPad Software Inc fisher’s lsd test
    Operant EtOH self-administration and progressive ratio testing in male and female mice. (A) Timeline EtOH self-administration procedure showing 3 experimental phases of acquisition, baseline, and progressive ratio testing as a function of week. (B,E) Total number of EtOH reinforced responses (B) and EtOH intake (E) by each mouse during four daily 16 h acquisition sessions, separated by sex. * - indicates significant mean difference between day 4 and day <t>1,</t> <t>Šídák’s</t> multiple comparisons test, p = 0.007. (C,F) EtOH reinforced responses plotted as a function of baseline day. Black lines are linear regression lines derived from regression analysis showing that the female slopes were significantly different from zero and that the two lines were different from each other for both responses (C) and intake (F) (see text). (D,G) Average EtOH reinforced responses (D) and EtOH intake (G) from week 1 and 4 showing an escalating pattern in female mice and difference between sexes during week 4. * p = 0.05; ** p < 0.01, Fisher’s <t>LSD</t> multiple comparisons test. Progressive ratio breakpoint (H) , duration of progressive ratio session (I) , and headpokes occurring during each session (J) plotted as a function of sex. Data were analyzed via unpaired t -test, * indicates p < 0.05. All data are plotted as MEAN ± SEM.
    Fisher’s Lsd Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fisher’s lsd test/product/GraphPad Software Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fisher’s lsd test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    SAS institute fisher’s lsd test
    Operant EtOH self-administration and progressive ratio testing in male and female mice. (A) Timeline EtOH self-administration procedure showing 3 experimental phases of acquisition, baseline, and progressive ratio testing as a function of week. (B,E) Total number of EtOH reinforced responses (B) and EtOH intake (E) by each mouse during four daily 16 h acquisition sessions, separated by sex. * - indicates significant mean difference between day 4 and day <t>1,</t> <t>Šídák’s</t> multiple comparisons test, p = 0.007. (C,F) EtOH reinforced responses plotted as a function of baseline day. Black lines are linear regression lines derived from regression analysis showing that the female slopes were significantly different from zero and that the two lines were different from each other for both responses (C) and intake (F) (see text). (D,G) Average EtOH reinforced responses (D) and EtOH intake (G) from week 1 and 4 showing an escalating pattern in female mice and difference between sexes during week 4. * p = 0.05; ** p < 0.01, Fisher’s <t>LSD</t> multiple comparisons test. Progressive ratio breakpoint (H) , duration of progressive ratio session (I) , and headpokes occurring during each session (J) plotted as a function of sex. Data were analyzed via unpaired t -test, * indicates p < 0.05. All data are plotted as MEAN ± SEM.
    Fisher’s Lsd Test, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fisher’s lsd test/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fisher’s lsd test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    GraphPad Software Inc uncorrected fisher’s lsd test
    Operant EtOH self-administration and progressive ratio testing in male and female mice. (A) Timeline EtOH self-administration procedure showing 3 experimental phases of acquisition, baseline, and progressive ratio testing as a function of week. (B,E) Total number of EtOH reinforced responses (B) and EtOH intake (E) by each mouse during four daily 16 h acquisition sessions, separated by sex. * - indicates significant mean difference between day 4 and day <t>1,</t> <t>Šídák’s</t> multiple comparisons test, p = 0.007. (C,F) EtOH reinforced responses plotted as a function of baseline day. Black lines are linear regression lines derived from regression analysis showing that the female slopes were significantly different from zero and that the two lines were different from each other for both responses (C) and intake (F) (see text). (D,G) Average EtOH reinforced responses (D) and EtOH intake (G) from week 1 and 4 showing an escalating pattern in female mice and difference between sexes during week 4. * p = 0.05; ** p < 0.01, Fisher’s <t>LSD</t> multiple comparisons test. Progressive ratio breakpoint (H) , duration of progressive ratio session (I) , and headpokes occurring during each session (J) plotted as a function of sex. Data were analyzed via unpaired t -test, * indicates p < 0.05. All data are plotted as MEAN ± SEM.
    Uncorrected Fisher’s Lsd Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/uncorrected fisher’s lsd test/product/GraphPad Software Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    uncorrected fisher’s lsd test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    statpoint inc manova (multifactor analysis of variance) fisher test 95% lsd statgraphics centurion
    Operant EtOH self-administration and progressive ratio testing in male and female mice. (A) Timeline EtOH self-administration procedure showing 3 experimental phases of acquisition, baseline, and progressive ratio testing as a function of week. (B,E) Total number of EtOH reinforced responses (B) and EtOH intake (E) by each mouse during four daily 16 h acquisition sessions, separated by sex. * - indicates significant mean difference between day 4 and day <t>1,</t> <t>Šídák’s</t> multiple comparisons test, p = 0.007. (C,F) EtOH reinforced responses plotted as a function of baseline day. Black lines are linear regression lines derived from regression analysis showing that the female slopes were significantly different from zero and that the two lines were different from each other for both responses (C) and intake (F) (see text). (D,G) Average EtOH reinforced responses (D) and EtOH intake (G) from week 1 and 4 showing an escalating pattern in female mice and difference between sexes during week 4. * p = 0.05; ** p < 0.01, Fisher’s <t>LSD</t> multiple comparisons test. Progressive ratio breakpoint (H) , duration of progressive ratio session (I) , and headpokes occurring during each session (J) plotted as a function of sex. Data were analyzed via unpaired t -test, * indicates p < 0.05. All data are plotted as MEAN ± SEM.
    Manova (Multifactor Analysis Of Variance) Fisher Test 95% Lsd Statgraphics Centurion, supplied by statpoint inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/manova (multifactor analysis of variance) fisher test 95% lsd statgraphics centurion/product/statpoint inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    manova (multifactor analysis of variance) fisher test 95% lsd statgraphics centurion - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    GraphPad Software Inc one-way anova function with fishers lsd post hoc test in graphpad prism
    Operant EtOH self-administration and progressive ratio testing in male and female mice. (A) Timeline EtOH self-administration procedure showing 3 experimental phases of acquisition, baseline, and progressive ratio testing as a function of week. (B,E) Total number of EtOH reinforced responses (B) and EtOH intake (E) by each mouse during four daily 16 h acquisition sessions, separated by sex. * - indicates significant mean difference between day 4 and day <t>1,</t> <t>Šídák’s</t> multiple comparisons test, p = 0.007. (C,F) EtOH reinforced responses plotted as a function of baseline day. Black lines are linear regression lines derived from regression analysis showing that the female slopes were significantly different from zero and that the two lines were different from each other for both responses (C) and intake (F) (see text). (D,G) Average EtOH reinforced responses (D) and EtOH intake (G) from week 1 and 4 showing an escalating pattern in female mice and difference between sexes during week 4. * p = 0.05; ** p < 0.01, Fisher’s <t>LSD</t> multiple comparisons test. Progressive ratio breakpoint (H) , duration of progressive ratio session (I) , and headpokes occurring during each session (J) plotted as a function of sex. Data were analyzed via unpaired t -test, * indicates p < 0.05. All data are plotted as MEAN ± SEM.
    One Way Anova Function With Fishers Lsd Post Hoc Test In Graphpad Prism, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/one-way anova function with fishers lsd post hoc test in graphpad prism/product/GraphPad Software Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    one-way anova function with fishers lsd post hoc test in graphpad prism - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    statpoint inc fisher’s least significant difference (lsd) method of the one-way anova or the paired-t test
    Operant EtOH self-administration and progressive ratio testing in male and female mice. (A) Timeline EtOH self-administration procedure showing 3 experimental phases of acquisition, baseline, and progressive ratio testing as a function of week. (B,E) Total number of EtOH reinforced responses (B) and EtOH intake (E) by each mouse during four daily 16 h acquisition sessions, separated by sex. * - indicates significant mean difference between day 4 and day <t>1,</t> <t>Šídák’s</t> multiple comparisons test, p = 0.007. (C,F) EtOH reinforced responses plotted as a function of baseline day. Black lines are linear regression lines derived from regression analysis showing that the female slopes were significantly different from zero and that the two lines were different from each other for both responses (C) and intake (F) (see text). (D,G) Average EtOH reinforced responses (D) and EtOH intake (G) from week 1 and 4 showing an escalating pattern in female mice and difference between sexes during week 4. * p = 0.05; ** p < 0.01, Fisher’s <t>LSD</t> multiple comparisons test. Progressive ratio breakpoint (H) , duration of progressive ratio session (I) , and headpokes occurring during each session (J) plotted as a function of sex. Data were analyzed via unpaired t -test, * indicates p < 0.05. All data are plotted as MEAN ± SEM.
    Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (Lsd) Method Of The One Way Anova Or The Paired T Test, supplied by statpoint inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fisher’s least significant difference (lsd) method of the one-way anova or the paired-t test/product/statpoint inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fisher’s least significant difference (lsd) method of the one-way anova or the paired-t test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    GraphPad Software Inc ordinary one-way ano va (uncorrected fisher’ s lsd) statistical tests
    Operant EtOH self-administration and progressive ratio testing in male and female mice. (A) Timeline EtOH self-administration procedure showing 3 experimental phases of acquisition, baseline, and progressive ratio testing as a function of week. (B,E) Total number of EtOH reinforced responses (B) and EtOH intake (E) by each mouse during four daily 16 h acquisition sessions, separated by sex. * - indicates significant mean difference between day 4 and day <t>1,</t> <t>Šídák’s</t> multiple comparisons test, p = 0.007. (C,F) EtOH reinforced responses plotted as a function of baseline day. Black lines are linear regression lines derived from regression analysis showing that the female slopes were significantly different from zero and that the two lines were different from each other for both responses (C) and intake (F) (see text). (D,G) Average EtOH reinforced responses (D) and EtOH intake (G) from week 1 and 4 showing an escalating pattern in female mice and difference between sexes during week 4. * p = 0.05; ** p < 0.01, Fisher’s <t>LSD</t> multiple comparisons test. Progressive ratio breakpoint (H) , duration of progressive ratio session (I) , and headpokes occurring during each session (J) plotted as a function of sex. Data were analyzed via unpaired t -test, * indicates p < 0.05. All data are plotted as MEAN ± SEM.
    Ordinary One Way Ano Va (Uncorrected Fisher’ S Lsd) Statistical Tests, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ordinary one-way ano va (uncorrected fisher’ s lsd) statistical tests/product/GraphPad Software Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ordinary one-way ano va (uncorrected fisher’ s lsd) statistical tests - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    GraphPad Software Inc fisher’s lsd multiple comparison test
    Operant EtOH self-administration and progressive ratio testing in male and female mice. (A) Timeline EtOH self-administration procedure showing 3 experimental phases of acquisition, baseline, and progressive ratio testing as a function of week. (B,E) Total number of EtOH reinforced responses (B) and EtOH intake (E) by each mouse during four daily 16 h acquisition sessions, separated by sex. * - indicates significant mean difference between day 4 and day <t>1,</t> <t>Šídák’s</t> multiple comparisons test, p = 0.007. (C,F) EtOH reinforced responses plotted as a function of baseline day. Black lines are linear regression lines derived from regression analysis showing that the female slopes were significantly different from zero and that the two lines were different from each other for both responses (C) and intake (F) (see text). (D,G) Average EtOH reinforced responses (D) and EtOH intake (G) from week 1 and 4 showing an escalating pattern in female mice and difference between sexes during week 4. * p = 0.05; ** p < 0.01, Fisher’s <t>LSD</t> multiple comparisons test. Progressive ratio breakpoint (H) , duration of progressive ratio session (I) , and headpokes occurring during each session (J) plotted as a function of sex. Data were analyzed via unpaired t -test, * indicates p < 0.05. All data are plotted as MEAN ± SEM.
    Fisher’s Lsd Multiple Comparison Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fisher’s lsd multiple comparison test/product/GraphPad Software Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fisher’s lsd multiple comparison test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Operant EtOH self-administration and progressive ratio testing in male and female mice. (A) Timeline EtOH self-administration procedure showing 3 experimental phases of acquisition, baseline, and progressive ratio testing as a function of week. (B,E) Total number of EtOH reinforced responses (B) and EtOH intake (E) by each mouse during four daily 16 h acquisition sessions, separated by sex. * - indicates significant mean difference between day 4 and day 1, Šídák’s multiple comparisons test, p = 0.007. (C,F) EtOH reinforced responses plotted as a function of baseline day. Black lines are linear regression lines derived from regression analysis showing that the female slopes were significantly different from zero and that the two lines were different from each other for both responses (C) and intake (F) (see text). (D,G) Average EtOH reinforced responses (D) and EtOH intake (G) from week 1 and 4 showing an escalating pattern in female mice and difference between sexes during week 4. * p = 0.05; ** p < 0.01, Fisher’s LSD multiple comparisons test. Progressive ratio breakpoint (H) , duration of progressive ratio session (I) , and headpokes occurring during each session (J) plotted as a function of sex. Data were analyzed via unpaired t -test, * indicates p < 0.05. All data are plotted as MEAN ± SEM.

    Journal: Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

    Article Title: Distinct sex differences in ethanol consumption and operant self-administration in C57BL/6J mice with uniform regulation by glutamate AMPAR activity

    doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1498201

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Operant EtOH self-administration and progressive ratio testing in male and female mice. (A) Timeline EtOH self-administration procedure showing 3 experimental phases of acquisition, baseline, and progressive ratio testing as a function of week. (B,E) Total number of EtOH reinforced responses (B) and EtOH intake (E) by each mouse during four daily 16 h acquisition sessions, separated by sex. * - indicates significant mean difference between day 4 and day 1, Šídák’s multiple comparisons test, p = 0.007. (C,F) EtOH reinforced responses plotted as a function of baseline day. Black lines are linear regression lines derived from regression analysis showing that the female slopes were significantly different from zero and that the two lines were different from each other for both responses (C) and intake (F) (see text). (D,G) Average EtOH reinforced responses (D) and EtOH intake (G) from week 1 and 4 showing an escalating pattern in female mice and difference between sexes during week 4. * p = 0.05; ** p < 0.01, Fisher’s LSD multiple comparisons test. Progressive ratio breakpoint (H) , duration of progressive ratio session (I) , and headpokes occurring during each session (J) plotted as a function of sex. Data were analyzed via unpaired t -test, * indicates p < 0.05. All data are plotted as MEAN ± SEM.

    Article Snippet: Post-hoc comparisons to evaluate specific differences were conducted using Šídák’s multiple comparisons test to control familywise error rates, or Fisher’s LSD test when conducting 4-family pairwise comparisons as implemented in GraphPad Prism.

    Techniques: Derivative Assay